Prediction of Laslo Djere [80th] vs Jacob Fearnley [74th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W W W L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LHead To Head: Djere 0 - 0 Fearnley
| Djere | Stats | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (17-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (14-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 80 | Ranking | 74 |
| 27 | Highest Rank | 73 |
| 29 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 6 |
| 59% (423-296) | Career Total W/L | 76% (87-28) |
| $3,498,370 | Career Prize Money | $443,455 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Laslo Djere vs Jacob Fearnley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Djere 0 - 0 Fearnley
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Djere has won 45.63% of points on their second serve, while Fearnley has won 45.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Djere, in recent form, has won 44.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fearnley has won 43.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.56% and 24.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Djere has saved 60.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fearnley has saved 62.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Djere has won 62.71% of matches played (W/L 37/ 22), with Fearnley winning 73.91% (W/L 51/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Djere has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 318/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Fearnley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 82% (W/L 46/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Djere has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/ 10), where as Fearnley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 86.05% of matches (W/L 37/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Djere has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.22 while Fearnley has played against players with an average rank of 225.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Djere has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fearnley has won 85% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Djere has converted 27.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fearnley has converted 27.01% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Laslo Djere vs Jacob Fearnley Best Odds For The Match
Laslo Djere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Laslo Djere
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Daniel Rincon
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Federico Coria
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
47
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Laslo Djere
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Francisco Comesana
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Laslo Djere
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Sebastian Baez
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Jaime Faria
50%
(
55 of
109)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
10
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
52 of
65)
56%
(
30 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Leo Borg
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tristan Boyer
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Thijs Boogaard
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
James Duckworth
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Djere vs Fearnley?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Djere Vs Fearnley is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (423/296) | Win/Loss | 76% (87/28) |
| 56% (978/771) | Sets Win/Loss | 69% (185/83) |
| 52% (8810/8199) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (1406/1071) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 2717 | Aces Total | 538 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2092 | Total Double Faults | 455 |
| 1:30:17 | Average Match Time | 1:23:52 |
| 153.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 214.63 |
| 60% (27269/45163) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4289/7025) |
| 70% (19051/27269) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (3152/4289) |
| 50% (8890/17894) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1396/2736) |
| 41% (1772/4293) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (353/792) |
| 39% (17409/44994) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3059/7346) |
| 61% (396/652) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 77% (84/109) |
| 34% (16/47) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 51% (145/287) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (19/28) |
| 58% (148/257) | Deciding Set Win % | 78% (25/32) |
| 85% (411/350) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (73/70) |
| 15% (411/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (73/3) |
| 23% (308/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 40% (42/17) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
